4.7 Article

K-shigaite-like layered double hydroxide particles as Pickering emulsifiers in oil/water emulsions

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2020.105660

关键词

Layered double hydroxides; Shigaite; Pickering's emulsion

资金

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior) [001]
  2. CAPES-PRINT [41/2017, 88887.311748/2018-00]
  3. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [430451/2018-0, 301172/2016-1, 400117/2016-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layered double hydroxide (LDH) intercalated with sulfate and potassium was synthesized by co-precipitation with increasing pH, presenting compositions similar to that of the mineral Na-shigaite ([Mn6Al3(OH)(18)][K (H2O)(6)(SO4)(2)]center dot 6H(2)O). We performed submicrometric layered particle characterization using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) as stabilizers in Pickering emulsions. Emulsification abilities were determined using macroscopic observations, optical microscopy and fluorescent confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), using different oil fractions and particle contents and comparing the size distributions of the emulsion droplets obtained. LDH particles produced thin films on oil-water droplet interfaces and reduced the emulsion surface tension from 61 to 55 x 10(-3) Nm(-1), suggesting that LDH particles adsorbed at the interface, reducing oil-water contact area and the system interfacial energy. Theoretical calculation of coverage (C) showed that only 0.25 wt % of particles, at 0.54 o/w fraction, was required for drop stabilization. The particles generated emulsions with high coalescence stability (14 days after preparation). CLSM images demonstrated the ability of the LDH particles to stabilize oil-in-water interface, water-in-oil interface and multiple emulsions, depending on the concentration of oil in the mixture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据