4.8 Article

High efficiency heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst biochar modified CuFeO2 for the degradation of tetracycline: Economical synthesis, catalytic performance and mechanism

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119386

关键词

Heterogeneous Fenton; CuFeO2; Biochar; Tetracycline; Response surface methodology

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678323]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017MEE026, ZR2019MD012]
  3. Support Plan on Youth Innovation Science and Technology for Higher Education of Shandong Province [2019KJD014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CuFeO2/BC catalyst showed higher catalytic activity for tetracycline degradation due to better particle dispersion and larger surface area, with optimal conditions being CuFeO2/BC-1.0, H2O2 concentration of 57.63 mM, and pH 6.27. Through experiments, it was demonstrated that CuFeO2/BC-1.0 has excellent reusability and stability.
The heterogeneous Fenton-like catalysts biochar modified CuFeO2 (CuFeO2/BC) were fabricated by hydrothermal method without additional chemical reducing agent. The systematic characterization demonstrated that higher CuFeO2 particles dispersion and larger BET surface area of CuFeO2/BC catalyst contributed to higher catalytic activity towards the tetracycline (TC) degradation compared to pure-phase CuFeO2. The optimum conditions for TC removal were 598.63 mg L(-1)( )of CuFeO2/BC-1.0, 57.63 mM of H2O2 and pH = 6.27 according to the result of a response surface methodology based on the central composite design. The CuFeO2/BC-1.0 exhibited an excellent reusability and good stability by recycling degradation. The (OH)-O-center dot was evidenced to the main active radical by scavenging experiments and electron spin resonance. The XPS revealed that the high catalytic efficiency was attributed to the synergistic effect of Fe3+/Fe2+ and Cu2+/Cu+ redox cycles, and the degradation intermediates of TC and toxicity analysis were evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据