4.5 Article

Studies on Microwave-assisted Ring-opening Polymerization and Property of Poly(9-phenyl-2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro-[5,5]undcane-3-one)

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 1330-1338

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10118-016-1852-y

关键词

Biodegradable polycarbonate; Microwave-assisted polymerization; Ring-opening polymerization; Hydrophilicity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51373128, 51173140]
  2. Key National Research and Development Program [2016YFB1101302]
  3. Wuhan Science and Technology Innovation Team of Hi-tech Industrial Project, Hubei Province [2015070504020217]
  4. Wuhan Scientific and Technological Project [2013010501010131]
  5. University Students' President Funded Project, Wuhan Institute of Technology [2015004]
  6. E+ double-major program
  7. Innovation Fund for post-graduate education, Wuhan Institute of Technology, China [CX2014058, CX2015007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(9-phenyl-2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro-[5,5]undcane-3-one) ( PPTC) was synthesized by the microwave-assisted ring-opening polymerization ( MROP) of a six-membered cyclic carbonate monomer 9-phenyl-2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro[5,5]undcane-3-one ( PTC) with tin( II) 2-ethylhexanoate (Sn(Oct)(2)) or aluminum isopropoxide (Al((OPr)-Pr-i)(3)) as the catalysts. The obtained polycarbonates were further reduced by apalladium/carbonate catalyst (10% Pd/C) to afford partly deprotected polycarbonates containing hydroxyl groups ( HPPTC). These two types of polycarbonates were characterized by H-1-NMR, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy ( FTIR), UV, gel permeation chromatography ( GPC), differential scanning calorimetry ( DSC), and automatic contact-angle measurements. The influence of the feed molar ratio of monomer-to-catalyst, the microwave irradiation power and the reaction time on the polymerization was also studied. The experimental results showed that HPPTC possessed significantly higher hydrophilicity and water absorption rate than PPTC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据