4.7 Article

Women Surgeons' Perspectives on System-level Strategies to Address Interpersonal Workplace Conflict

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 273, 期 3, 页码 494-499

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004074

关键词

adjudication; communication; sex equity; patient safety; women in surgery; women surgeons; workplace conflict

类别

资金

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [K08HS025778-01A1]
  2. Medtronic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study highlights the need for more comprehensive understanding of conflict resolution methods in the workplace, particularly for women surgeons. Recommendations include direct conflict resolution, transparent reporting processes, greater opportunity to address complaints, explicit policies for recurring conflicts, and separating interpersonal complaints from patient safety reporting mechanisms. Continued institutional efforts are necessary to mitigate inequities against women surgeons.
Objective: We sought to gain a comprehensive understanding of the current methods for conflict resolution and the ways in which women surgeons would prefer workplace conflicts to be adjudicated. Summary of Background Data: Interprofessional workplace conflicts are poorly studied, particularly for women in surgery. These conflicts may negatively impact surgical team dynamic and be detrimental to patient safety. Moreover, workplace conflicts and their management are a proposed driver of decreased professional satisfaction and achievement. How women surgeons experience workplace conflicts and how these are managed remains unexplored. Methods: We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with women surgeons across the United States who had experienced workplace conflict that resulted in action by a nonphysician. Surgeons were diverse with respect to demographics, specialty, and institutional settings. Through thematic analysis using NVivo, we analyzed and reported patterns within the data. Results: Although the majority of women asserted resilience in how they engage with these situations, many also cited ways in which these events could better be adjudicated. Recommendations included (1) more direct conflict resolution, (2) more transparency in reporting processes, (3) greater opportunity to address complaints, (4) explicit policies for events that repeatedly result in workplace conflict, and (5) divorcing interpersonal complaints from patient safety reporting mechanisms. Conclusion: This study motivates and informs best practices around adjudication of workplace conflict to help protect women surgeons and nonclinicians. Going forward, best practices should include more objective criteria for how conflicts are adjudicated. Continued efforts at an institutional level are needed to help mitigate inequities against women surgeons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据