4.0 Article

Comparison of Open and Endoscopic Approaches in the Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma

期刊

ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY
卷 130, 期 2, 页码 136-141

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0003489420939582

关键词

esthesioneuroblastoma; olfactory neuroblastoma; endoscopic sinus surgery; sinonasal cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that patients with olfactory neuroblastoma who underwent endoscopic surgery had a higher 5-year overall survival rate compared to those who underwent open surgery, and had a shorter postoperative hospital stay.
Background: Olfactory neuroblastoma, or esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB), is an uncommon sinonasal malignancy arising from olfactory neuroepithelium that is optimally treated with surgical resection. The objective of this study is to determine preoperative predictors of undergoing open versus endoscopic approach for ENB and to investigate significant postoperative survival outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for cases of ENB histology that were treated surgically from 2010 to 2015. Groups were stratified into open or endoscopic approach cohorts. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modality, and 5-year overall survival were compared between the two groups using Chi-Square analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cases were classified as Kadish stage A, B, C, or D based on the Collaborative Stage-Extension codes in NCDB. Results: Of 533 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 276 (51.8%) patients underwent open, and 257 (48.2%) patients underwent endoscopic surgical approaches. Patients undergoing endoscopic surgery were more likely to be Kadish stages A and B and less likely to be stages C and D (P = .020). Those undergoing endoscopic approach overall had a shorter mean hospital stay postoperatively (3.8 vs. 7.0 days,P < .001). Endoscopic cases had a greater 5-year overall survival (81.9% vs. 75.6%,P = .030); after multivariate regression, there was a trend toward survival benefit to endoscopic surgery that did not reach clinical significance (HR 0.644, [0.392-1.058],P = .083). Conclusion: Although not statistically significant, there is a trend toward increased overall survival with an endoscopic approach in patients undergoing surgery for ENB as compared to an open approach, regardless of Kadish stage. An endoscopic approach is an adequate alternative to an open approach for the surgical treatment of ENB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据