4.7 Article

Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an International Myeloma Working Group report

期刊

BLOOD
卷 125, 期 13, 页码 2068-2074

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-12-615187

关键词

-

资金

  1. Amgen
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Genmab A/S
  4. Celgene
  5. Janssen-Cilag
  6. Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc
  7. Onyx Pharmaceuticals
  8. Onyx
  9. Novartis
  10. Millennium
  11. Cephalon
  12. Merck
  13. Abbott
  14. Janssen
  15. Sanofi
  16. Array Pharmaceuticals
  17. Millennium Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted a pooled analysis of 869 individual newly diagnosed elderly patient data from 3 prospective trials. At diagnosis, a geriatric assessment had been performed. An additive scoring system (range 0-5), based on age, comorbidities, and cognitive and physical conditions, was developed to identify 3 groups: fit (score = 0, 39%), intermediate fitness (score = 1,31%), and frail (score >= 2, 30%). The 3-year overall survival was 84% in fit, 76% in intermediate-fitness (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; P = .042), and 57% in frail (HR, 3.57; P<.001) patients. The cumulative incidence of grade >= 3 nonhematologic adverse events at 12 months was 22.2% in fit, 26.4% in intermediate-fitness (HR, 1.23; P = .217), and 34.0% in frail (HR, 1.74; P < .001) patients. The cumulative incidence of treatment discontinuation at 12 months was 16.5% in fit, 20.8% in intermediate-fitness (HR, 1.41; P = .052), and 31.2% in frail (HR, 2.21; P < .001) patients. Our frailty score predicts mortality and the risk of toxicity in elderly myeloma patients. The International Myeloma Working group proposes this score for the measurement of frailty in designing future clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据