4.8 Article

Mechanistic Insight into a Novel Ultrasensitive Nicotine Assay Base on High-Efficiency Quenching of Gold Nanocluster Cathodic Electrochemiluminescence

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 16, 页码 11438-11443

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02500

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675024, 21874020]
  2. Program for Innovative Leading Talents in Fujian Province [2016B016]
  3. Fujian Province Health Commission Young and Middle-Aged Talent training project [2018-ZQN-62]
  4. Program for Fujian Youth Talent Support Project [2019B016]
  5. Natural Sciences Foundation of Fujian Province [2019J01305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monitoring nicotine concentrations in human fluids is extremely crucial owing to the harmful effect of nicotine on human health. Herein, it is shown that nicotine could quench the cathodic electrochemiluminescence (ECL) of gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) with high efficiency. The ECL quenching mechanism of nicotine was studied in detail using various experimental tools and theoretical calculations. It was concluded that the strongly oxidizing intermediate SO4 center dot-, produced from K2S2O8, could oxidized nicotine, resulting in ECL emission quenching. On the basis of this high-efficiency ECL quenching of the AuNCs/K2S2O8 system, a recyclable, ultrasensitive, and selective ECL sensing platform for nicotine detection was proposed. Even in the absence of any complex signal amplification techniques, the ECL sensor for nicotine detection showed an unprecedentedly low detection limit of 7.0 X 10(-13) M (S/N = 3) and a wide linear range over 8 orders of magnitude. Most remarkably, it could be successfully used for nicotine detection in human urine samples. This is expected to promote the investigations and applications on nicotine-related diseases. We believe that the proposed ECL platform can hold great prospects for commercialization in biomedical fields and tobacco industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据