4.8 Article

Construction of Specific and Reversible Nanoreceptors for Proteins via Sequential Surface-Imprinting Strategy

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 15, 页码 10540-10547

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01366

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21775009, 21974005, 21904006]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [2184103, 7192096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

WMolecular recognition of proteins is critical for study and manipulation of protein-related biological processes. However, design and synthesis of abiotic receptors for precise recognition of proteins still remains a challenging task. Herein, we developed a universal sequential surface-imprinting strategy that integrated two different types of imprinting reactions to construct artificial protein receptors with high selectivity. Employing dopamine self-polymerization and boronate/diol complexation as the first-step and second-step imprinting reactions, respectively, we synthesized surface-imprinted magnetic nanocomposites against two different enzyme proteins: deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease/redox effector factor 1 (APE1). The obtained nanocomposites both showed strong and specific binding toward their respective template proteins. Moreover, the bound enzymes could be totally recovered with high activity under mild buffer conditions. These antibody-like specific and reversible binding properties enabled effective purification and enrichment of the low-abundance target proteins from complex serum samples. Compared to existing one-pot or one-step imprinting methods, the proposed sequential surface-imprinting approach offers a more flexible combination of different functional monomers and greatly enhances the performance and biocompatibility of the imprinted materials. The generality and simplicity of the sequential imprinting strategy would make it an appealing and competitive method to prepare artificial protein receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据