4.8 Article

Higher Resolution Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 16, 页码 11357-11364

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02133

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM131100, R01AI118933]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1531823]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Charge detection mass spectrometry is a single particle technique where the masses of individual ions are determined from simultaneous measurements of each ion's m/z ratio and charge. The ions pass through a conducting cylinder, and the charge induced on the cylinder is detected. The cylinder is usually placed inside an electrostatic linear ion trap so that the ions oscillate back and forth through the cylinder. The resulting time domain signal is analyzed by fast Fourier transformation; the oscillation frequency yields the m/z, and the charge is determined from the magnitudes. The mass resolving power depends on the uncertainties in both quantities. In previous work, the mass resolving power was modest, around 30-40. In this work we report around an order of magnitude improvement. The improvement was achieved by coupling high-accuracy charge measurements (obtained with dynamic calibration) with higher resolution m/z measurements. The performance was benchmarked by monitoring the assembly of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) capsid. The HBV capsid assembly reaction can result in a heterogeneous mixture of intermediates extending from the capsid protein dimer to the icosahedral T = 4 capsid with 120 dimers. Intermediates of all possible sizes were resolved, as well as some overgrown species. Despite the improved mass resolving power, the measured peak widths are still dominated by instrumental resolution. Heterogeneity makes only a small contribution. Resonances were observed in some of the m/z spectra. They result from ions with different masses and charges having similar m/z values. Analogous resonances are expected whenever the sample is a heterogeneous mixture assembled from a common building block.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据