4.8 Article

First-Principles Collision Cross Section Measurements of Large Proteins and Protein Complexes

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 16, 页码 11155-11163

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01285

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1707675]
  2. National Institutes of Health [DP2GM123486, R01GM121751, P41GM1285771]
  3. MDS SCIEX Professorship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rotationally averaged collision cross section (CCS) values for a series of proteins and protein complexes ranging in size from 8.6 to 810 kDa are reported. The CCSs were obtained using a native electrospray ionization drift tube ion mobility-Orbitrap mass spectrometer specifically designed to enhance sensitivity while having high-resolution ion mobility and mass capabilities. Periodic focusing (PF)-drift tube (DT)-ion mobility (IM) provides first-principles determination of the CCS of large biomolecules that can then be used as CCS calibrants. The experimental, first-principles CCS values are compared to previously reported experimentally determined and computationally calculated CCS using projected superposition approximation (PSA), the Ion Mobility Projection Approximation Calculation Tool (IMPACT), and Collidoscope. Experimental CCS values are generally in agreement with previously reported CCSs, with values falling within similar to 5.5%. In addition, an ion mobility resolution (CCS centroid divided by CCS fwhm) of similar to 60 is obtained for pyruvate kinase (MW similar to 233 kDa); however, ion mobility resolution for bovine serum albumin (MW similar to 68 kDa) is less than similar to 20, which arises from sample impurities and underscores the importance of sample quality. The high resolution afforded by the ion mobility-Orbitrap mass analyzer provides new opportunities to understand the intricate details of protein complexes such as the impact of post-translational modifications (PTMs), stoichiometry, and conformational changes induced by ligand binding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据