4.8 Article

MS-CleanR: A Feature-Filtering Workflow for Untargeted LC-MS Based Metabolomics

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 14, 页码 9971-9981

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01594

关键词

-

资金

  1. French National Infrastructure for Metabolomics and Fluxomics [MetaboHUB-ANR-11-INBS-0010]
  2. PSPC SOLSTICE Project (SOLutionS pour des Traitements Integres dans une Conduite Environnementale)
  3. French state within the framework of the Programme d'Investissements d'Avenir

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Untargeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is currently the goldstandard technique to determine the full chemical diversity in biological samples. However, this approach still has many limitations; notably, the difficulty of accurately estimating the number of unique metabolites profiled among the thousands of MS ion signals arising from chromatograms. Here, we describe a new workflow, MS-CleanR, based on the MS-DIAL/MS-FINDER suite, which tackles feature degeneracy and improves annotation rates. We show that implementation of MS-CleanR reduces the number of signals by nearly 80% while retaining 95% of unique metabolite features. Moreover, the annotation results from MSFINDER can be ranked according to the database chosen by the user, which enhance identification accuracy. Application of MS-CleanR to the analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana grown in three different conditions fostered class separation resulting from multivariate data analysis and led to annotation of 75% of the final features. The full workflow was applied to metabolomic profiles from three strains of the leguminous plant Medicago truncatula that have different susceptibilities to the oomycete pathogen Aphanomyces euteiches. A group of glycosylated triterpenoids overrepresented in resistant lines were identified as candidate compounds conferring pathogen resistance. MS-CleanR is implemented through a Shiny interface for intuitive use by end-users (available at https://github.com/eMetaboHUB/MS-CleanR).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据