4.7 Article

A SERS-colorimetric dual-mode aptasensor for the detection of cancer biomarker MUC1

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 412, 期 23, 页码 5707-5718

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-02790-7

关键词

MUC1; Aptamer; SERS; Colorimetry; Aptasensor; Magnetic nanoparticles

资金

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [61535003]
  2. National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars [61822503]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61675042, 61505027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human mucin-1 (MUC1) has attracted considerable attention owing to its overexpression in diverse malignancies. Here, for the rapid and efficient detection of MUC1, we present a SERS-colorimetric dual-mode aptasensor, by integrating SERS probes with magnetic separation, which has several distinctive advantages. Using such a dual-mode aptasensor, the colorimetric functionality is distinguishable by the naked eye, providing a fast and straightforward screening ability for the detection of MUC1. Moreover, SERS-based detection greatly improves the detection sensitivity, reaching a limit of detection of 0.1 U/mL. In addition, the combination of SERS and colorimetric method holds the advantages of these two techniques and thereby increases the reliability and efficiency of MUC1 detection. On the one hand, the magnetic nanobeads functionalized with MUC1-specific aptamer were utilized as an efficient capturing substrate for separating MUC1 from biological complex medium. On the other hand, the gold-silver core-shell nanoparticles modified with Raman reporters and the complementary sequences of MUC1 were used as the signal indicator, which could simultaneously report the SERS signal and colorimetric change. This strategy can achieve a good detection range and realize MUC1 analysis in real patients' samples. Thus, we anticipate that this kind of aptasensor would provide promising potential applications in the diagnosis and prognosis of cancers. Graphical abstract

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据