4.6 Article

Ensuring the need is met: A 50-year simulation study of the National Kidney Registry's family voucher program

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 1128-1137

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16101

关键词

donors and donation; living; donors and donation; paired exchange; ethics; ethics and public policy; kidney transplantation; nephrology; kidney transplantation; living donor; simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The National Kidney Registry's Advanced Donation Program allows living donors to donate in advance and receive a voucher for a future transplant. A Monte Carlo simulation study suggests that NKR should be able to meet the increasing demand for voucher redemptions over the next 50 years.
The National Kidney Registry (NKR) Advanced Donation Program enables living donors the opportunity to donate altruistically, or in advance of a potential recipient's transplant, and to receive a voucher that can be redeemed for a future transplant facilitated by the NKR. Family vouchers allow a donor to identify multiple individuals within their immediate family, with the first person in that group in need of a transplant being prioritized to receive a kidney. An increase in vouchers introduces concerns that demand for future voucher redemptions could exceed the supply of available donors and kidneys. A Monte Carlo simulation model was constructed to estimate the annual number of voucher redemptions relative to the number of kidneys available over a 50-year time horizon under several projected scenarios for growth of the program. In all simulated scenarios, the number of available kidneys exceeded voucher redemptions every year. While not able to account for all real-life scenarios, this simulation study found that the NKR should be able to satisfy the likely redemption of increasing numbers of vouchers under a range of possible scenarios over a 50-year time horizon. This modeling exercise suggests that a donor family's future needs can be satisfied through the voucher program.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据