4.3 Article

Low genetic diversity and limited genetic structure across the range of the critically endangered Mexican howler monkey (Alouatta palliata mexicana)

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
卷 82, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23160

关键词

conservation genetics; isolation by distance; microsatellites; neotropical primate; population structure

类别

资金

  1. PROMEP [103.5/03/1154EXB-9]
  2. National Science Foundation [BCS-0962807, DEB-0640519]
  3. University of Michigan OVPR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic diversity provides populations with the possibility to persist in ever-changing environments, where selective regimes change over time. Therefore, the long-term survival of a population may be affected by its level of genetic diversity. The Mexican howler monkey (Alouatta palliata mexicana) is a critically endangered primate restricted to southeast Mexico. Here, we evaluate the genetic diversity and population structure of this subspecies based on 83 individuals from 31 groups sampled across the distribution range of the subspecies, using 29 microsatellite loci. Our results revealed extremely low genetic diversity (H-O = 0.21,H-E = 0.29) compared to studies of otherA. palliatapopulations and to otherAlouattaspecies. Principal component analysis, a Bayesian clustering method, and analyses of molecular variance did not detect strong signatures of genetic differentiation among geographic populations of this subspecies. Although we detect small but significantF(ST)values between populations, they can be explained by a pattern of isolation by distance. These results and the presence of unique alleles in different populations highlight the importance of implementing conservation efforts in multiple populations across the distribution range ofA. p. mexicanato preserve its already low genetic diversity. This is especially important given current levels of population isolation due to the extreme habitat fragmentation across the distribution range of this primate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据