4.6 Article

Adherence to Healthy Dietary Patterns and Risk of CKD Progression and All-Cause Mortality: Findings From the CRIC (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort) Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 235-244

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.04.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [U01DK060990, U01DK060984, U01DK061022, U01DK061021, U01DK061028, U01DK060980, U01DK060963, U01DK060902]
  2. Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [UL1TR000003]
  3. Johns Hopkins University [UL1 TR-000424]
  4. University of Maryland grant General Clinical Research Center [M01 RR-16500]
  5. NCATS component of the NIH [UL1TR000439]
  6. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research [UL1TR000433]
  7. University of Illinois at Chicago CTSA [UL1RR029879]
  8. Kaiser Permanente NIH/National Center for Research Resources University of California San Francisco-Clinical & Translational Science Institute [UL1 RR-024131]
  9. NIDDK [K23DK094829, K24DK092290, R01-DK072231-91]
  10. NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [T32 HL007024]
  11. NHLBI [R21 HL143089, 1K24 HL148181]
  12. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P20GM109036]
  13. Tulane Center of Biomedical Research Excellence for Clinical and Translational Research in Cardiometabolic Diseases grant [P20 GM109036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study concluded that greater adherence to several healthy dietary patterns is associated with lower risk for CKD progression and all-cause mortality among people with CKD. Adopting healthy dietary patterns can be considered as a strategy for managing CKD.
Rationale & Objective: Current dietary guidelines recommend that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) restrict individual nutrients, such as sodium, potassium, phosphorus, and protein. This approach can be difficult for patients to implement and ignores important nutrient interactions. Dietary patterns are an alternative method to intervene on diet. Our objective was to define the associations of 4 healthy dietary patterns with risk for CKD progression and all-cause mortality among people with CKD. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: 2,403 participants aged 21 to 74 years with estimated glomerular filtration rates of 20 to 70 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and dietary data in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study. Exposures: Healthy Eating Index-2015, Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010, alternate Mediterranean diet (aMed), and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet scores were calculated from food frequency questionnaires. Outcomes: (1) CKD progression defined as >= 50% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, kidney transplantation, or dialysis and (2) all-cause mortality. Analytical Approach: Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and clinical covariates to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Results: There were 855 cases of CKD progression and 773 deaths during a maximum of 14 years. Compared with participants with the lowest adherence, the most highly adherent tertile of Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010, aMed, and DASH had lower adjusted risk for CKD progression, with the strongest results for aMed (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.90). Compared with participants with the lowest adherence, the highest adherence tertiles for all scores had lower adjusted risk for all-cause mortality for each index (24%-31% lower risk). Limitations: Self-reported dietary intake. Conclusions: Greater adherence to several healthy dietary patterns is associated with lower risk for CKD progression and all-cause mortality among people with CKD. Guidance to adopt healthy dietary patterns can be considered as a strategy for managing CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据