4.6 Article

Mechanisms Leading to Differential Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Signaling in the Diabetic Kidney: Modulation by SGLT2 Inhibitors and Hypoxia Mimetics

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 280-286

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.04.016

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SGLT2 inhibitors exert renoprotective effects in diabetic kidneys by modulating the balance of HIF-1α and HIF-2α activities, promoting erythropoiesis, alleviating cellular stress, and reducing inflammation and fibrosis.
Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors exert important renoprotective effects in the diabetic kidney, which cannot be readily explained by their actions to lower blood glucose, blood pressure, or glomerular filtration pressures. Their effects to promote erythrocytosis suggest that these drugs act on hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs; specifically, HIF-1a and HIF-2 alpha), which may underlie their ability to reduce the progression of nephropathy. Type 2 diabetes is characterized by renal hypoxia, oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress, and defective nutrient deprivation signaling, which (acting in concert) are poised to cause both activation of HIF-1 alpha and suppression of HIF-2 alpha. This shift in the balance of HIF-1 alpha/HIF-2 alpha activities promotes proinflammatory and profibrotic pathways in glomerular and renal tubular cells. SGLT2 inhibitors alleviate renal hypoxia and cellular stress and enhance nutrient deprivation signaling, which collectively may explain their actions to suppress HIF-1 alpha and activate HIF-2 alpha and thereby augment erythropoiesis, while muting organellar dysfunction, inflammation, and fibrosis. Cobalt chloride, a drug conventionally classified as a hypoxia mimetic, has a profile of molecular and cellular actions in the kidney that is similar to those of SGLT2 inhibitors. Therefore, many renoprotective benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors may be related to their effect to promote oxygen deprivation signaling in the diabetic kidney.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据