4.6 Article

Causal Effects of Air Pollution on Mortality Rate in Massachusetts

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 189, 期 11, 页码 1316-1323

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa098

关键词

air pollution; big data computing; causality; generalized propensity score; linear probability model

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [P30 ES000002, R01 ES024332]
  2. Environmental Protection Agency [RD-83587201, RD-83615601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Air pollution epidemiology studies have primarily investigated long- and short-term exposures separately, have used multiplicative models, and have been associational studies. Implementing a generalized propensity score adjustment approach with 3.8 billion person-days of follow-up, we simultaneously assessed causal associations of long-term (1-year moving average) and short-term (2-day moving average) exposure to particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 mu m (PM2.5), ozone, and nitrogen dioxide with all-cause mortality on an additive scale among Medicare beneficiaries in Massachusetts (2000-2012). We found that long- and short-term PM2.5, ozone, and nitrogen dioxide exposures were all associated with increased mortality risk. Specifically, per 10 million person-days, each 1-mu g/m(3) increase in long- and short-term PM2.5 exposure was associated with 35.4 (95% confidence interval (CD: 33.4, 37.6) and 3.04 (95% CI: 2.17, 3.94) excess deaths, respectively; each 1-part per billion (ppb) increase in long- and short-term ozone exposure was associated with 2.35 (95% CI: 1.08, 3.61) and 2.41 (95% CI: 1.81, 2.91) excess deaths, respectively; and each 1-ppb increase in long- and short-term nitrogen dioxide exposure was associated with 3.24 (95% CI: 2.75, 3.77) and 5.60 (95% CI: 5.24, 5.98) excess deaths, respectively. Mortality associated with long-term PM2.5 and ozone exposure increased substantially at low levels. The findings suggested that air pollution was causally associated with mortality, even at levels below national standards.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据