4.6 Article

EAACI Biologicals Guidelines-Recommendations for severe asthma

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 76, 期 1, 页码 14-44

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.14425

关键词

biologicals; cost-effectiveness; GRADE; guidelines; severe asthma

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation, Christine Kuhne-Center for Allergy Research and Education, European Commission
  2. Cure
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Genentech
  5. Novartis
  6. Sanofi Regeneron
  7. Amgen
  8. Genentech/Roche
  9. Stallergenes
  10. Teva
  11. GSK
  12. Innovation Fund Denmark
  13. Regeneron
  14. Regeneron, Ena Therapeutics
  15. Sanofi Genzyme
  16. Sunovion
  17. Mylan
  18. Asthma UK, Food Standards Agency
  19. AZ
  20. Roche
  21. AHL
  22. Nutricia
  23. Boehringer Ingelheim
  24. Gerolymatos International SA
  25. Mundipharma, Zambon
  26. Sanofi/Regeneron
  27. Fondazione Maugeri, Fondazione Chiesi and Edmond Pharma
  28. Chiesi
  29. Sanofi
  30. Mundipharma, Esteve
  31. Allergopharma, Stallergenes Greer, HAL Allergy Holding BV/HAL Allergie GmbH, Bencard Allergie GmbH/Allergy Therapeutics
  32. Circassia
  33. ASIT Biotech Tools SA, Laboratorios LETI/LETI Pharma
  34. Anergis SA, Mobile Chamber Experts
  35. Med Update Europe GmbH
  36. Mundipharma
  37. ASIT Biotech.sa, Allergy Therapeutics
  38. Allergopharma
  39. Inmunotek SL
  40. ALK-Abello, Allergopharma
  41. Anergis
  42. Vectura
  43. MedImmune

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Severe asthma poses significant challenges in management, but targeted treatments with biologicals offer new hope for patients. However, further research is needed on issues such as selection of biologicals, response definition, treatment duration, and cost-effectiveness.
Severe asthma imposes a significant burden on patients, families and healthcare systems. Management is difficult, due to disease heterogeneity, co-morbidities, complexity in care pathways and differences between national or regional healthcare systems. Better understanding of the mechanisms has enabled a stratified approach to the management of severe asthma, supporting the use of targeted treatments with biologicals. However, there are still many issues that require further clarification. These include selection of a certain biological (as they all target overlapping disease phenotypes), the definition of response, strategies to enhance the responder rate, the duration of treatment and its regimen (in the clinic or home-based) and its cost-effectiveness. The EAACI Guidelines on the use of biologicals in severe asthma follow the GRADE approach in formulating recommendations for each biological and each outcome. In addition, a management algorithm for the use of biologicals in the clinic is proposed, together with future approaches and research priorities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据