4.5 Article

Dynamic Stall Under Combined Pitching and Surging

期刊

AIAA JOURNAL
卷 58, 期 12, 页码 5134-5145

出版社

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/1.J059153

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation [2012103]
  2. Israel Science Foundation [840/11]
  3. German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development [1176-208.10]
  4. Lady Davis Fellowship Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamic stall often occurs under conditions of simultaneous unsteady pitching and surging (e.g., rotorcraft and wind turbines), but many models employ a dimensionless time base that implicitly assumes that surging is superimposed, in a quasi-steady manner, on dynamic pitching. An unsteady wind tunnel was used to examine this assumption, where a technique was developed to quantify the unsteady effects of surging on a pitching NACA 0018 airfoil. The technique involved performing multiple harmonic pitching experiments under nominally steady freestream conditions that bracketed a corresponding 50% surging amplitude (1.25.10(5)<= Re <= 3.75.10(5)). By interpolating these data, unsteady-pitching/quasi-steady-surging data sets were constructed and compared with de facto synchronous pitch and surging experiments, thereby isolating the unsteady effects of surging on a pitching airfoil. Both large and small poststall maximum angles of attack (alpha(s)+5 degrees and alpha(s)+15 degrees) were considered at multiple pitch-surge phase differences. During deep dynamic stall (alpha(s)+15 degrees), with large-scale separation, surging was seen to have a secondary effect on the unsteady aerodynamics. However, at small poststall maximum angles of attack (alpha(s)+5 degrees), either light or deep dynamic stall behavior was observed depending upon the pitch-surge phase difference. This was attributed to Reynolds number history effects, exemplified by boundary-layer transition, and thus it can be referred to as transitional dynamic stall.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据