4.7 Article

Landscape composition and configuration affect the abundance of the olive moth (Prays oleae, Bernard) in olive groves

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.106854

关键词

Conservation biological control; Multi scale analysis; Crop management; Perennial crops; Generalized additive mixed models

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) [EXCL/AGR-PRO/0591/2012, PTDC/ASP-PLA/30003/2017, UIDB/00690/2020]
  2. Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology [SFRH/BPD/119487/2016]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [EXCL/AGR-PRO/0591/2012, SFRH/BPD/119487/2016, PTDC/ASP-PLA/30003/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Landscape and crop management are important concepts for conservation biological control as they can influence the abundance of natural enemies. In this work we accomplished a multi-scale study focused on the effect of landscape structure and crop management on the olive moth, Prays oleae (Bernard), an important pest of the olive tree (Olea europaea L.). The olive moth was collected in different olive groves managed under organic farming and integrated production and surrounded by different landscape structures. Generalized additive mixed models were used to analyze the response of the pest to (i) landscape composition and configuration indices, (ii) the management system and (iii) pesticides applications at different scales. Results indicated that the landscape composition, through the effect of the Simpson's diversity index, negatively influenced P. oleae abundance and that the effect was evident at larger scales. Also, the landscape configuration negatively affected P. oleae at larger scales. However, neither the crop management system nor the pesticide applications affected P. oleae abundance. This study emphasizes that the preservation or implementation of diverse and complex landscapes can contribute to maintain lower population levels of P. oleae when compared with homogenous landscape areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据