4.6 Article

PDIA3 correlates with clinical malignant features and immune signature in human gliomas

期刊

AGING-US
卷 12, 期 15, 页码 15392-15413

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.103601

关键词

PDIA3; prognosis; tumor microenvironment; immune response

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81703622, 81472693, 81873635]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633002]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2018JJ3838]
  4. Hunan provincial health and Health Committee Foundation of China [C2019186]
  5. Xiangya Hospital Central South University postdoctoral foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since therapeutic strategies are limited in gliomas, new molecules or biomarkers are essential for diagnosis and therapy. Here, we investigated expression of protein disulfide isomerase family A member 3 (PDIA3) in gliomas to evaluate its potential as a promising immune target or biomarker. Transcriptome level, genomic profiles and its association with clinical practice from TCGA and CGGA databases were analyzed. All statistical analyses were performed using R project. In gliomas with high PDIA3 expression, somatic mutations showed the correlation with loss of PTEN and amplification of EGFR; meanwhile, in PDIA3 low gliomas, mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) took 80%. Moreover, PDIA3 was found to positively correlate with ESTIMATE scores and diverse infiltrating immune and stromal cell types localizing in tumor microenvironment. PDIA3 was found to be highly correlated with macrophage and T cells based on single cell sequencing. Additionally, PDIA3 was also involved in suppression of anti-tumor immunity via multiple immune regulatory processes. Finally, PDIA3 was observed to correlate with other immune checkpoint inhibitors and associated with inflammation. Our findings identified the significance of PDIA3 in the process of gliomas and demonstrated the potential of PDIA3 as a molecular target in prognosis and immune related treatment of gliomas

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据