4.6 Article

Genetic variation between long-lived versus short-lived bats illuminates the molecular signatures of longevity

期刊

AGING-US
卷 12, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.103725

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council Research Grant [ERC-2012-StG311000]
  2. UCD Wellcome Institutional Strategic Support Fund - University College Dublin [204844/Z/16/Z]
  3. UCD Wellcome Institutional Strategic Support Fund - SFI-HRB-Wellcome Biomedical Research Partnership [204844/Z/16/Z]
  4. Irish Research Council Consolidator Laureate Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bats are the longest-lived mammals given their body size with majority of species exhibiting exceptional longevity. However, there are some short-lived species that do not exhibit extended lifespans. Here we conducted a comparative genomic and transcriptomic study on long-lived Myotis myotis (maximum lifespan = 37.1 years) and short-lived Molossus molossus (maximum lifespan = 5.6 years) to ascertain the genetic difference underlying their divergent longevities. Genome-wide selection tests on 12,467 single-copy genes between M. myotis and M. molossus revealed only three genes (CCDC175, FATE1 and MLKL) that exhibited significant positive selection. Although 97.96% of 12,467 genes underwent purifying selection, we observed a significant heterogeneity in their expression patterns. Using a linear mixed model, we obtained expression of 2,086 genes that may truly represent the genetic difference between M. myotis and M. molossus. Expression analysis indicated that long-lived M. myotis exhibited a transcriptomic profile of enhanced DNA repair and autophagy pathways, compared to M. molossus. Further investigation of the longevity associated genes suggested that long-lived M. myotis have naturally evolved a diminished anti-longevity transcriptomic profile. Together with observations from other long-lived species, our results suggest that heightened DNA repair and autophagy activity may represent a universal mechanism to achieve longevity in long-lived mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据