4.8 Article

A High-Efficiency CoSe Electrocatalyst with Hierarchical Porous Polyhedron Nanoarchitecture for Accelerating Polysulfides Conversion in Li-S Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 32, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202002168

关键词

CoSe; electrocatalysts; hierarchical porous polyhedra; lithium-sulfur batteries; polysulfides conversion

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China New Energy Project for Electric Vehicle [2016YFB0100204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772030]
  3. Beijing Outstanding Young Scientists Program [BJJWZYJH01201910007023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are recognized as promising candidates for next-generation electrochemical energy storage systems owing to their high energy density and cost-effective raw materials. However, the sluggish multielectron sulfur redox reactions are the root cause of most of the issues for Li-S batteries. Herein, a high-efficiency CoSe electrocatalyst with hierarchical porous nanopolyhedron architecture (CS@HPP) derived from a metal-organic framework is presented as the sulfur host for Li-S batteries. The CS@HPP with high crystal quality and abundant reaction active sites can catalytically accelerate capture/diffusion of polysulfides and precipitation/decomposition of Li2S. Thus, the CS@HPP sulfur cathode exhibits an excellent capacity of 1634.9 mAh g(-1), high rate performance, and a long cycle life with a low capacity decay of 0.04% per cycle over 1200 cycles. CoSe nanopolyhedrons are further fabricated on a carbon cloth framework (CC@CS@HPP) to unfold the electrocatalytic activity by its high electrical conductivity and large surface area. A freestanding CC@CS@HPP sulfur cathode with sulfur loading of 8.1 mg cm(-2)delivers a high areal capacity of 8.1 mAh cm(-2)under a lean electrolyte. This work will enlighten the rational design of structure-catalysis engineering of transition-metal-based nanomaterials for diverse applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据