4.8 Article

Interfacial Molecular Doping of Metal Halide Perovskites for Highly Efficient Solar Cells

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 31, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202001581

关键词

interfacial molecular doping; perovskite solar cells

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [A9550-16-1-0299]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-1903981]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51922074, 51673138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tailoring the doping of semiconductors in heterojunction solar cells shows tremendous success in enhancing the performance of many types of inorganic solar cells, while it is found challenging in perovskite solar cells because of the difficulty in doping perovskites in a controllable way. Here, a small molecule of 4,4 ',4 '',4 '''-(pyrazine-2,3,5,6-tetrayl) tetrakis (N,N-bis(4-methoxyphenyl) aniline) (PT-TPA) which can effectively p-dope the surface of FA(x)MA(1-)(x)PbI(3)(FA: HC(NH2)(2); MA: CH3NH3) perovskite films is reported. The intermolecular charge transfer property of PT-TPA forms a stabilized resonance structure to accept electrons from perovskites. The doping effect increases perovskite dark conductivity and carrier concentration by up to 4737 times. Computation shows that electrons in the first two layers of octahedral cages in perovskites are transferred to PT-TPA. After applying PT-TPA into perovskite solar cells, the doping-induced band bending in perovskite effectively facilitates hole extraction to hole transport layer and expels electrons toward cathode side, which reduces the charge recombination there. The optimized devices demonstrate an increased photovoltage from 1.12 to 1.17 V and an efficiency of 23.4% from photocurrent scanning with a stabilized efficiency of 22.9%. The findings demonstrate that molecular doping is an effective route to control the interfacial charge recombination in perovskite solar cells which is in complimentary to broadly applied defect passivation techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据