4.8 Article

Controlling Enamel Remineralization by Amyloid-Like Amelogenin Mimics

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 31, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202002080

关键词

amelogenin; amyloid; biomineralization; dental caries; enamel

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673112]
  2. 111 Project [B14041]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Gk202007006, Gk2011801003, 2017CBY004]
  4. Open Project of the State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [sklssm202030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In situ regeneration of the enamel-like structure of hydroxyapatite (HAp) crystals under oral conditions is significant for dental caries treatment. However, it is still a challenge for dentists to duplicate the elegant and well-aligned apatite structure bonding to the surface of demineralized enamel. A biocompatible amelogenin-inspired matrix, a phasetransited lysozyme (PTL) film mimicking an N-terminal amelogenin with central domain (N-Ame) combined with synthetic peptide (C-AMG) based on the functional domains of C-terminal telopeptide (C-Ame) is shown here, which is formed by amyloid-like lysozyme aggregation at the enamel interface through a rapid one-step aqueous coating process. In the PTL/C-AMG matrix, C-AMG facilitated the oriented arrangement of amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) nanoparticles and their transformation to ordered enamel-like HAp crystals, while PTL served as a strong interfacial anchor to immobilize the C-AMG peptide and PTL/C-AMG matrix on versatile substrate surfaces. PTL/C-AMG film-coated enamel induced both of the in vivo and in vitro synthesis of HAp crystals, facilitated epitaxial growth of HAp crystals and recovered the highly oriented structure and mechanical properties to levels nearly identical to those of natural enamel. This work underlines the importance of amyloid-like protein aggregates in the biomineralization of enamel, providing a promising strategy for treating dental caries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据