4.8 Article

An Acoustic Meta-Skin Insulator

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 37, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202002251

关键词

acoustic metasurfaces; superhydrophobicity; underwater acoustic waveguiding

资金

  1. Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong SAR [AoE/P-02/12]
  2. CUHK Group Research Scheme
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11690030, 11690032, 11674119]
  4. Purdue University through EFC on Future Manufacturing
  5. Bird Nest Plan of HUST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acoustic metamaterials with artificial microstructures are attractive to realize intriguing functions, including efficient waveguiding, which requires large impedance mismatches to realize total side reflection with negligible transmission and absorption. While large impedance mismatch can be readily realized in an air environment, acoustic waveguiding in an underwater environment remains elusive due to insufficient impedance mismatch of state-of-the-art metamaterials. Here, a superhydrophobic acoustic metasurface of microstructured poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane, referred to as a meta-skin insulator, which is able to confine acoustic waves in an all-angle and wide spectrum range due to tremendous impedance mismatch at stable air/water interfaces, viz., the Cassie-Baxter state is demonstrated. By utilizing the meta-skin insulator with broadband and high throughput, orbital-angular-momentum multiplexing at a high spectral efficiency and binary coding along large-angle bending channels for bit-error-free acoustic data transmission in an underwater environment are demonstrated. Very different from optical and/or electrical cable communications, acoustic waves can be simply and effectively coupled into remote meta-skin acoustic fibers from free space, which is technologically significant for long-haul and anti-interference communication. This work can enlighten many fluidic applications based on efficient waveguiding, such as in vivo ultrasound medical treatment and imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据