4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

An easily recoverable thermo-sensitive polyelectrolyte as draw agent for forward osmosis process

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 86-93

出版社

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2015.11.015

关键词

Forward osmosis; Draw agent; Thermo-sensitive polyelectrolyte; Recovery method; Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21276162]
  2. Program for Yangtse River Scholars and Innovative Research Team in Universities [IRT1163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a potential solution to the crises of energy and resources, forward osmosis (FO) has been limited by the development of draw agents. An ideal draw agent should be able to generate high osmotic pressure and can be easily recovered. In this study, a thermo-sensitive polyelectrolyte of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) (PNA) is developed as an efficient draw agent, and two easy and simple methods are proposed to effectively recover the polyelectrolytes. After adjusting the pH value of polyelectrolyte solutions to around 6.0, the polyelectrolyte can generate relatively high osmotic pressure, and induce average water fluxes of 2.09 and 2.95 L.m(-2).h(-1) during 12 h FO processes when the polyelectrolyte concentrations are 0.20 and 0.38 g.ml(-1) respectively. After acidifying and heating to 70 degrees C, the PNA-10 polyelectrolyte can aggregate together because of hydrophobic association and separate from water, so it can be easily recovered by either simple centrifugation or gravitational sedimentation. The recovery ratios of PNA-10 polyelectrolyte in both methods are as high as 89%, and the recovered polyelectrolytes can be reused with almost the same FO performance as fresh ones. The results in this study provide valuable guidance for designing efficient and easily recoverable draw agents for FO processes. (C) 2015 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据