4.5 Article

Multivariate time delay analysis based local KPCA fault prognosis approach for nonlinear processes

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 1413-1422

出版社

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2016.06.011

关键词

Fault prognosis; Time delay estimation; Local kernel principal component analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61573051, 61472021]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing [4142039]
  3. Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment [SKLSDE-2015KF-01]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [PT1613-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, some fault prognosis technology occasionally has relatively unsatisfied performance especially for incipient faults in nonlinear processes duo to their large time delay and complex internal connection. To overcome this deficiency, multivariate time delay analysis is incorporated into the high sensitive local kernel principal component analysis. In this approach, mutual information estimation and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) are separately used to acquire the correlation degree and time delay of the process variables. Moreover, in order to achieve prediction, time series prediction by back propagation (BP) network is applied whose input is multivariate correlated time series other than the original time series. Then the multivariate time delayed series and future values obtained by time series prediction are combined to construct the input of local kernel principal component analysis (LKPCA) model for incipient fault prognosis. The new method has been exemplified in a simple nonlinear process and the complicated Tennessee Eastman (TE) benchmark process. The results indicate that the new method has superiority in the fault prognosis sensitivity over other traditional fault prognosis methods. (C) 2016 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据