4.8 Article

Endothelial Regulation of Drug Transport in a 3D Vascularized Tumor Model

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 48, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202002444

关键词

drug transport; engineered vessels; multidrug resistance; P-gp; vascularized tumor

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-0939511]
  3. American-Italian Cancer Foundation Post-Doctoral Research Fellowship
  4. Amgen, Incorporated
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research post-doctoral fellowship
  6. National Institutes of Health [U01 CA214381]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug discovery and efficacy in cancer treatments are limited by the inability of pre-clinical models to predict successful outcomes in humans. Limitations remain partly due to their lack of a physiologic tumor microenvironment (TME), which plays a considerable role in drug delivery and tumor response to therapy. Chemotherapeutics and immunotherapies rely on transport through the vasculature, via the smallest capillaries and stroma to the tumor, where passive and active transport processes are at play. Here, a 3D vascularized tumor on-chip is used to examine drug delivery in a relevant TME within a large bed of perfusable vasculature. This system demonstrates highly localized pathophysiological effects of two tumor spheroids (Skov3 and A549), which cause significant changes in vessel density and barrier function. Paclitaxel (Taxol) uptake is examined through diffusivity measurements, functional efflux assays, and accumulation of the fluorescent-conjugated drug within the TME. Due to vascular and stromal contributions, differences in the response of vascularized tumors to Taxol (shrinkage and CD44 expression) are apparent compared with simpler models. This model specifically allows for examination of spatially resolved tumor-associated endothelial dysfunction, likely improving the representation of in vivo drug distribution, and has potential for development into a more predictable model of drug delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据