4.7 Article

Eradication of B-ALL using chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T cells targeting the TSLPR oncoprotein

期刊

BLOOD
卷 126, 期 5, 页码 629-639

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-11-612903

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stand Up To Cancer St. Baldrick's Pediatric Dream Team Translational Research Grant [SU2C-AACR-DT1113]
  2. William Lawrence and Blanche Hughes Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [UMICA1837390]
  4. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation (ALSF)
  5. National Center For Research Resources [UL1RR024134]
  6. National Cancer Institute [K08CA184418]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adoptive transfer of T cells genetically modified to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) targeting the CD19 B cell-associated protein have demonstrated potent activity against relapsed/refractory B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Not all patients respond, and CD19-negative relapses have been observed. Overexpression of the thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor (TSLPR; encoded by CRLF2) occurs in a subset of adults and children with B-ALL and confers a high risk of relapse. Recent data suggest the TSLPR signaling axis is functionally important, suggesting that TSLPR would be an ideal immunotherapeutic target. We constructed short and long CARs targeting TSLPR and tested efficacy against CRLF2-overexpressing B-ALL. Both CARs demonstrated activity in vitro, but only short TSLPRCART cells mediated leukemia regression. In vivo activity of the short CAR was also associated with long-term persistence of CAR-expressing T cells. Short TSLPR CAR treatment of mice engrafted with a TSLPR-expressing ALL cell line induced leukemia cytotoxicity with efficacy comparable with that of CD19 CART cells. Short TSLPR CAR T cells also eradicated leukemia in 4 xenograft models of human CRLF2-over expressing ALL. Finally, TSLPR has limited surface expression on normal tissues. TSLPR-targeted CAR T cells thus represent a potent oncoprotein-targeted immunotherapy for high-risk ALL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据