4.8 Article

Network Topology in Water Nanoconfined between Phospholipid Membranes

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 8616-8623

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02984

关键词

water confined; phospholipid membrane; hydrogen bond; hydrogen-bond network; coordination defects; order parameter

资金

  1. STFC Hartree Centre's Innovation Return on Research program - Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
  2. Spanish grant (MCIU/AEI/ERDF) [PGC2018-099277-B-C22]
  3. ICREA Foundation (ICREA Academia prize)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water provides the driving force for the assembly and stability of many cellular components. Despite its impact on biological functions, a nanoscale understanding of the relationship between its structure and dynamics under soft confinement has remained elusive. As expected, water in contact with biological membranes recovers its bulk density and dynamics at similar to 1 nm from phospholipid headgroups but surprisingly enhances its intermediate range order (IRO) over a distance, at least, twice as large. Here, we explore how the IRO is related to the water's hydrogen-bond network (HBN) and its coordination defects. We characterize the increased IRO by an alteration of the HBN up to more than eight coordination shells of hydration water. The HBN analysis emphasizes the existence of a bound-unbound water interface at similar to 0.8 nm from the membrane. The unbound water has a distribution of defects intermediate between bound and bulk water, but with density and dynamics similar to bulk, while bound water has reduced thermal energy and many more HBN defects than low-temperature water. This observation could be fundamental for developing nanoscale models of biological interactions and for understanding how alteration of the water structure and topology, for example, due to changes in extracellular ions concentration, could affect diseases and signaling. More generally, it gives us a different perspective to study nanoconfined water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据