4.8 Article

Softness- and Size-Dependent Packing Symmetries of Polymer-Grafted Nanoparticles

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 9644-9651

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c00668

关键词

polymer-grafted nanoparticles; effective softness; self-assembly; polymer ligand; body-centered tetragonal

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) Grant - Korean Government [NRF-2020M3H4A1A01086888, 2017M3D1A1039553, 2020M31A210101310, 2019R1I1A1A01058781]
  2. Research Projects of the KAIST-KUSTAR
  3. TJ Park Science Fellowship of POSCO TJ Park Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation [NSF DMR 1905487]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1I1A1A01058781] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Achieving ordered arrays of nanoparticles (NPs) with controlled packing symmetry and interparticle spacing is of great importance to design complex metamaterials. Herein, we report softness- and size-dependent self-assembly behavior of polystyrene-grafted Au NPs (Au@PS NPs). We varied the core size of Au NPs from 1.9 to 9.6 nm and the number-average molecular weight (M-n) of thiol-terminated polystyrene from 1.8 to 7.9 kg mol(-1). The optimal packing model based on an effective softness parameter lambda(eff) that accounts for close-packed and semidilute brush regimes could predict the effective radius of Au@PS NPs (within +/- 9%) for a wide range of PS M-n, grafting density, and Au core size. With increasing lambda(eff), the self-assembled Au@PS NP superlattices undergo a symmetry transition from hexagonal dose packed (hcp) to body-centered tetragonal (bct) to body-centered cubic (bcc). This work demonstrates the effective softness model as a simple but robust tool for the design of NP superlattices with precisely controlled interparticle distance and packing symmetry, both of which are critical for the development of sophisticated materials through control of nanoscale structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据