4.8 Article

Holey Pt Nanosheets on NiFe-Hydroxide Laminates: Synergistically Enhanced Electrocatalytic 2D Interface toward Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 10578-10588

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c04628

关键词

two dimensional Pt; surface-confined growth; layered double hydroxides; 2D-2D heterointerface; interfacial synergy; alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP) [NRF-2016R1A3B1907559]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130012323] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Next-generation electrocatalysts with smart integrated designs, maximizing the chemical cascade synergy for sustainable hydrogen production, are needed to address the urgent environmental threats, but scalable synthesis of precisely architectured nanohybrids rendering a few-nanometer interfacial controllability to augment the catalytic reactivity and operational stability is a major bottleneck. Herein, by inventing a surface-confined lateral growth of nanometer-thin and nanoporous two-dimensional (2D)-Pt on NiFe-LDH nanosheets, a highly reactive 2D-2D interfacially integrated nanoplatform is synthesized for an alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) which not only extracts high Pt-atomic utilization efficiency but also synergistically accelerates the water dissociation and hydrogen generation cascade on the colocalized Pt/M(OH)(x) active sites, endowing a 6.1-fold higher Pt mass activity than 20% Pt/C and also empowers a record-high HER operational stability for 50 h, due to the chemically enforced lamellar architecture. This work offers a gateway to produce active metal nanosheets tailored with a suitable active-template surface in order to invent and enforce futuristic catalysis technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据