4.8 Article

Defective VSe2-Graphene eterostructures Enabling In Situ Electrocatalyst Evolution for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 11929-11938

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c05030

关键词

lithium-sulfur batteries; VSe2-graphene heterostructure; Se vacancy; polysulfide adsorption; reaction kinetics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702225]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFA0200103]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170336]
  4. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z161100002116020]
  5. Suzhou Key Laboratory for Advanced Carbon Materials and Wearable Energy Technologies, Suzhou, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrocatalysts remain vitally important for the rational management of intermediate polysulfides (LiPSs) in the realm of Li-S batteries. In terms of transition-metal-based candidates, in situ evolution of electrocatalysts in the course of an electrochemical process has been acknowledged; nevertheless, consensus has not yet been reached on their real functional states as well as catalytic mechanisms. Herein, we report an all-chemical vapor deposition design of the defective vanadium diselenide (VSe2)-vertical graphene (VG) heterostructure on carbon cloth (CC) targeting a high-performance sulfur host. The electrochemistry induces the sulfurization of VSe2 to VS2 at Se vacancy sites, which propels the adsorption and conversion of LiPSs. Accordingly, the VSe2-VG@CC/S electrode harvests an excellent cycling stability at 5.0 C with a capacity decay of only 0.03990 per cycle over 800 cycles, accompanied by a high areal capacity of 4.9 mAh cm(-2) under an elevated sulfur loading of 9.6 mg cm(-2). Theoretical simulation combined with operando characterizations reveals the key role played by the Se vacancy with respect to the electrocatalyst evolution and LiPS regulation. This work offers insight into the rational design of heterostructure sulfur hosts throughout defect engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据