4.6 Article

Identification of SUMO Binding Enriched after Covalent Photo-Cross-Linking Proteins

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 2406-2414

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.0c00609

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [SFB858/B-14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Post-translational modification with the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) affects thousands of proteins in the human proteome and is implicated in numerous cellular processes. The main outcome of SUMO conjugation is a rewiring of proteinprotein interactions through recognition of the modifiers surface by SUMO binding proteins. The SUMO-interacting motif (SIM) mediates binding to a groove on SUMO; however, the low affinity of this interaction and the poor conservation of SIM sequences complicates the isolation and identification of SIM proteins. To address these challenges, we have designed and biochemically characterized monomeric and multimeric SUMO-2 probes with a genetically encoded photo-cross-linker positioned next to the SIM binding groove. Following photoinduced covalent capture, even weak SUMO binders are not washed away during the enrichment procedure, and very stringent washing conditions can be applied to remove nonspecifically binding proteins. A total of 329 proteins were isolated from nuclear HeLa cell extracts and identified using mass spectrometry. We found the molecular design of our probes was corroborated by the presence of many established SUMO interacting proteins and the high percentage (>90%) of hits containing a potential SIM sequence, as predicted by bioinformatic analyses. Notably, 266 of the 329 proteins have not been previously reported as SUMO binders using traditional noncovalent enrichment procedures. We confirmed SUMO binding with purified proteins and mapped the position of the covalent cross-links for selected cases. We postulate a new SIM in MRE11, involved in DNA repair. The identified SUMO binding candidates will help to reveal the complex SUMO-mediated protein network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据