4.8 Article

Stable and Catalytically Active Shape-Engineered Cerium Oxide Nanorods by Controlled Doping of Aluminum Cations

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 33, 页码 37774-37783

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c11049

关键词

shape engineered; ceria; controllable doping; atomic layer deposition; stability

资金

  1. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [56265-DNI10]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF CHE-1657943]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  4. U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility, at Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shape-engineered nanocrystals (SENs) promise a better selectivity and a higher activity in catalytic reactions than the corresponding non-shape-engineered ones because of their larger specific surface areas and desirable crystal facets. However, often, it is challenging to apply SENs in practical catalytic applications at high reaction temperatures, where SENs deforms into more stable, less active nanoparticles. In this paper, we show that atomic layer deposition (ALD) of Al2O3 at 200 degrees C can controllably dope Al cations into the shape-engineered CeO2 nanorods (NRs) to not only increase their shape transition temperature from 400 degrees C to beyond 700 degrees C but also greatly increase their specific reversible oxygen storage capacity (srOSC). The substituted Al3+ ions impede the surface diffusion of Ce ions and therefore improve the thermal stability of CeO2 NRs. These Al3+ dopants form -Al-O-Ce-O- clusters, which are new Ce species and can be reversibly reduced and oxidized at 500-700 degrees C. This low-temperature chemical doping method decouples the synthesis process of SENs from the doping process and maintains the shape of the SENs during the activation of dopants. This concept could be adopted to enable the applications of other SENs in challenging high-temperature environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据