4.8 Article

Chemical Fixation of CO2 Using Highly Dispersed Cu on Hierarchically Porous N-Doped Carbon

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 36, 页码 40236-40247

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c08001

关键词

carbon dioxide; copper catalyst; coupling reaction; hierarchical porosity; N-doped carbon

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1810111, 21676089]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2018B030311010]
  3. Youth Science and Technology Innovation Talent of Guangdong TeZhi Plan [2019TQ05L111]
  4. Key Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University [2018BCE002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical transformation of carbon dioxide (CO2) into fine chemicals such as oxazolidinones and carbamates is mainly reported using transition-metal complexes as homogeneous catalysts. Herein, we demonstrate that a heterogeneous catalyst of highly dispersed Cu (Cu/NHPC) supported on hierarchically porous N-doped carbon (NHPC) can efficiently promote CO2 fixations to oxazolidinones and beta-oxopropylcarbamates. The obtained NHPC, assembled by ultrathin nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheets with a three-dimensional (3D) structure, is readily prepared by pyrolysis of a nitrogen-containing polymer gel (NPG) in the presence of an activator of potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3). The resulting NHPC shows specific Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) surface areas up to 2054 m(2) g(-1) with a mean micro/ mesopore size of 0.55/3.2 nm and a broad macropore size distribution from 50 to 230 nm. The Cu/NHPC can efficiently promote three-component coupling of CO2, amines, and propargyl alcohols for syntheses of various oxazolidinones and beta-oxopropylcarbamates with yields up to 99% and a wide substrate scope. Moreover, the Cu/NHPC exhibits excellent recyclability in CO2-to-oxazolidinone transformation during nine-time recycling. The research thus develops an NHPC-based heterogeneous Cu catalyst for green transformation of CO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据