4.8 Article

Probing Ink-Powder Interactions during 3D Binder Jet Printing Using Time-Resolved X-ray Imaging

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 30, 页码 34254-34264

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c03572

关键词

inkjet printing; ink-powder interaction; capillary infiltration; Washburn model; X-radiography; synchrotron in situ imaging

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, U.K.) [EP/L012022/1, EP/P025021/1]
  2. Department of Biotechnology (DBT, India) [BT/PR13466/COE/34/26/2015]
  3. Commonwealth Scholarship Commission, U.K.
  4. EPSRC [EP/L012022/1, EP/P025021/1, EP/S019367/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capillary-driven ink infiltration through a porous powder bed in three-dimensional (3D) binder jet printing (inkjet printing onto a powder bed) controls the printing resolution and as-printed green strength of the resulting object. However, a full understanding of the factors controlling the kinetics of the infiltration remains incomplete. Here, high-resolution in situ synchrotron radiography provides time-resolved imaging of the penetration of an aqueous solution of eythylene glycol through a porous alumina powder bed, used as a model system. A static drop-on-demand inkjet printer was used to dispense liquid droplets onto a powder surface. The subsequent migration of the liquid front and its interactions with powder particles were tracked using fast synchrotron X-radiography in the Diamond Synchrotron, with phase-contrast imaging at a frame rate of 500 Hz. Image processing and analysis reveal that both the time-dependent increment in the wetting area and the propagation of the interface leading edge exhibit heterogeneous behavior in both temporal and spatial domains. However, mean infiltration kinetics are shown to be consistent with existing infiltration models based on the Washburn equation modified to account for the spreading of the liquid drop on the powder surface and using a modified term for the bed porosity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据