4.6 Article

Poly-L-lysine/Sodium Alginate Coating Loading Nanosilver for Improving the Antibacterial Effect and Inducing Mineralization of Dental Implants

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 5, 期 18, 页码 10562-10571

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00986

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31670967]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of the Institute for Translational Medicine of Anhui Province [2017zhyx19]
  3. University Outstanding Youth Talent Support Program of Anhui Province [gxyq2018007]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Anhui Province [2018B264]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, antibacterial surface modification of titanium (Ti) implants has been widely studied in preventing implant-associated infection for dental and orthopedic applications. The purpose of this study was to prepare a composite coating on a porous titanium surface for infection prevention and inducing mineralization, which was initialized by deposition of a poly-L-lysine (PLL)/sodium alginate(SA)/PLL self-assembled coating, followed by dopamine deposition, and finally in situ reduction of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) by dopamine. The surface zeta potential, SEM, XPS, UV-vis, and water contact angle analyses demonstrate that each coating was successfully prepared after the respective steps and that the average sizes of AgNPs were 20-30 nm. The composite coating maintained Ag+ release for more than 27 days in PBS and induced mineralization when incubated in SBF. The antibacterial results showed that the composite coating inhibited/killed bacteria on the material surface and killed bacteria around them. In addition, although this coating inhibited the initial adhesion of osteoblasts, the mineralized surface greatly enhanced the cytocompatibility. Thus, we concluded that the composite coating could prevent bacterial infections and facilitate mineralization in vivo in the early postoperative period, and then, the mineralized surface could enhance the cytocompatibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据