4.6 Article

A Refinement of Nitrogen Isotope Analysis of Coal Using Elemental Analyzer/Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry and the Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Compositions of Coals Imported in China

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 5, 期 13, 页码 7636-7640

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00488

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFF0215400]
  2. Instrument Function Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [IGG201603]
  3. CAS Key Technology Talent Program
  4. Key Research Program of the Institute of Geology & Geophysics, CAS [IGGCAS-201905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to accurately analyze nitrogen (N) isotopes of coal is important for evaluating its contribution to NOX emissions to the atmosphere via coal combustion. Although an elemental analyzer/isotope ratio mass spectrometer is highly efficient for analyzing the N isotopes of coal, it requires large amounts of organic matter (>3 mg) to produce enough N-2 to enable N isotope measurements due to the high organic carbon contents of coal with relatively low N contents. Therefore, to completely oxidize the organic matter, more oxidant matter is required to enhance coal combustion in a reactor tube in an elemental analyzer through injecting O-2 during the combustion process. One reference material (RM) (GBW11104) was used to determine the effect of amounts of O-2 on the accuracy of nitrogen isotope values obtained. Our results show that small amounts of O-2 injected into the EA resulted in incomplete coal combustion, which yielded a lower N content and more positive N isotope ratio for RM (GBW11104) than those obtained by complete combustion. Thus, to ensure the complete combustion of coal, large O-2 injection amounts are required. The refined method was applied to provide the N isotope values of coals imported from Southeast Asia, Russia, and Australia. Combined with the carbon isotope values, the imported coals from three coal-producing regions (Southeast Asia, Russia, and Australia) display distinct characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据