4.6 Article

Biological Filtering and Substrate Promiscuity Prediction for Annotating Untargeted Metabolomics

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo10040160

关键词

metabolomics; metabolite annotation; enzyme promiscuity; extended metabolic models

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM132391]
  2. National Science Foundation [1909536]
  3. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1909536] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mass spectrometry coupled with chromatography separation techniques provides a powerful platform for untargeted metabolomics. Determining the chemical identities of detected compounds however remains a major challenge. Here, we present a novel computational workflow, termed extended metabolic model filtering (EMMF), that aims to engineer a candidate set, a listing of putative chemical identities to be used during annotation, through an extended metabolic model (EMM). An EMM includes not only canonical substrates and products of enzymes already cataloged in a database through a reference metabolic model, but also metabolites that can form due to substrate promiscuity. EMMF aims to strike a balance between discovering previously uncharacterized metabolites and the computational burden of annotation. EMMF was applied to untargeted LC-MS data collected from cultures of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and murine cecal microbiota. EMM metabolites matched, on average, to 23.92% of measured masses, providing a > 7-fold increase in the candidate set size when compared to a reference metabolic model. Many metabolites suggested by EMMF are not catalogued in PubChem. For the CHO cell, we experimentally confirmed the presence of 4-hydroxyphenyllactate, a metabolite predicted by EMMF that has not been previously documented as part of the CHO cell metabolic model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据