4.7 Article

Excessive antigen reactivity may underlie the clinical aggressiveness of chronic lymphocytic leukemia stereotyped subset #8

期刊

BLOOD
卷 125, 期 23, 页码 3580-3587

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-603217

关键词

-

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro AIRC, Milano, Italy [9965]
  2. Ricerca Finalizzata, Ministero della Salute, Roma
  3. ENosAI project [09SYN-13-880]
  4. EU
  5. General Secretariat for Research and Technology of Greece
  6. KRIPIS action
  7. European Regional Development Fund of the EU under the O.P. Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship (NSRF)
  8. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute [RO1 CA081554]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subset #8 is a distinctive subset of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) defined by the expression of stereotyped IGHV4-39/IGKV1(D)-39 B-cell receptors. Subset #8 patients experience aggressive disease and exhibit the highest risk for Richter transformation among all CLL. In order to obtain biological insight into this behavior, we profiled the antigen reactivity and signaling capacity of subset #8 vs other clinically aggressive stereotyped subsets, namely subsets #1 and #2. Twenty-seven monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from subsets #1, #2, and #8 CLL clones were prepared as recombinant human immunoglobulin G1 and used as primary antibodies in enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assays against representatives of the major classes of established antigenic targets for CLL. Subset #8 CLL mAbs exhibited broad polyreactivity as they bound to all antigens tested, in clear contrast with the mAbs from the other subsets. Antigen challenge of primary CLL cells indicated that the promiscuous antigen-binding activity of subset #8 mAbs could lead to significant cell activation, again in contrast to the less responsive CLL cells from subsets #1 and #2. These features constitute a distinctive profile for CLL subset #8, supporting the existence of distinct mechanisms of aggressiveness in different immunogenetic subsets of CLL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据