4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Decarbonising heating and hot water using solar thermal collectors coupled with thermal storage: The scale of the challenge

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 25-34

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.02.024

关键词

Solar thermal collectors; Silver nanofluids; Thermal storage; Salt hydrates; Decarbonising

资金

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through the Centre for Doctoral Training in Energy Storage and its Applications grant at the University of Southampton, UK [EP/L016818/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the feasibility of using renewable solar thermal energy linked to a salt hydrate thermochemical store (reversible chemical reaction involving the addition / removal of water from a salt) to provide a zero-carbon heating and hot water option for an average UK home. Volumetric absorption based on diluted colloidal suspensions or nanofluids containing wavelength tuneable plasmonic silver nanoparticles are a possible means for enhancing solar thermal capture. To make full use of this captured energy, it requires inter-seasonal storage in a suitable energy dense, high efficiency thermal store. As such even the potentially highest energy density obtainable for a salt hydrate thermochemical store would still need a store of greater than 35 m(3) (10 MWh) to nearly meet current winter heating and hot water demands (with 1 discharge cycle per annum). With a possible increase in collector efficiency to over 70% such a system would collect enough solar energy annually to become viable for homes with a greater than average (>15 m(2)) roof area, a lower than median consumption (<12,000 kWhyr(-1)) and enough space for a large thermochemical store (<= 46 m(3)). This paper concludes by detailing the significant additional research efforts required to bring this possible decarbonising solution to a prototype level of maturity. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据