4.6 Article

Development and Evaluation of a Single Dye Duplex Droplet Digital PCR Assay for the Rapid Detection and Quantification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8050701

关键词

Mycobacterium tuberculosis; ddPCR; qPCR; Quantification; Detection; Duplex assay; Simplex assay; IS6110; IS1081

资金

  1. Megaproject of Infectious Disease Control from Ministry of Health of China [2017ZX10302301-005]
  2. Sino-Africa Joint Research Center [SAJC201605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a third generation of PCR that was recently developed to overcome the challenges of real-time fluorescence-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) in absolute quantification of pathogens. Few studies have been done on tuberculosis (TB) detection and quantification using ddPCR despite its many advantages over qPCR. From the few studies, none explores a single dye duplex assay for the detection and quantification of TB. In this study, steps toward developing and evaluating a duplex single dye (FAM) assay for detecting two targets (IS6110 and IS1081) are clearly described using simplex and duplex experiments. To achieve this, various parameters are investigated, including annealing temperature, primer and probe concentration, sensitivity and specificity, sample concentration, and inter/intra-assay variability. From the results, primer and probe concentration, annealing temperature, and sample concentration have an effect on the position and separation of droplets in both simplex and duplex assays. The copies of target genes in a duplex assay can be estimated accurately using the threshold tool with little inter-assay (CV <1%) and intra-assay (CV <6%) variability when compared to simplex assays. The ddPCR assay specificity and sensitivity are both 100% when compared to qPCR. This work shows steps toward the detection and quantification of two targets in a single channel, enabling higher multiplexing to include more targets in future works.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据