4.7 Article

High-Pressure Extraction of Antioxidant-Rich Fractions from Shrubby Cinquefoil (Dasiphora fruticosaL. Rydb.) Leaves: Process Optimization and Extract Characterization

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox9060457

关键词

Dasiphora fruticosa; antioxidant capacity; pressurized-liquid extraction; response surface methodology; phenolic compounds; supercritical carbon dioxide extraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dasiphora fruticosa(basionymPotentilla fruticosa) is a shrub, known in traditional medicine for centuries. Due to the wide range of pharmacological effects, interest and applications ofD. fruticosaextracts are continually increasing; however, reports on optimization of extraction conditions are scarce. Herein, a multi-step high-pressure extraction process with increasing polarity solvents was developed to isolate valuable fractions fromD. fruticosaleaves. Supercritical CO(2)extraction recovered 2.46 g/100 g of lipophilic fraction, rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Further, pressurized liquid extractions (PLE) with acetone, ethanol, and water were applied to obtain antioxidant-rich higher polarity extracts. Under optimized PLE conditions, the cumulative polar fraction yield was 29.98 g/100 g. Ethanol fraction showed the highest yield (15.3 g/100 g), TPC values (148.4 mg GAE/g), ABTS(center dot+), and DPPH(center dot)scavenging capacity (161.1 and 151.8 mg TE/g, respectively). PLE was more efficient than conventional solid-liquid extraction in terms of extraction time, extract yields, and in vitro antioxidant capacity. Phytochemical characterization of PLE extracts by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS revealed the presence of hyperoside, ellagic acid, among other health beneficial phenolic substances. tau his study highlights the potential of high-pressure extraction techniques to isolate antioxidant-rich fractions fromD. fruticosaleaves with multipurpose applications, including the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据