4.7 Article

Factors Affecting the Retention Efficiency and Physicochemical Properties of Spray Dried Lipid Nanoparticles Loaded with Lippia sidoides Essential Oil

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom10050693

关键词

lipid nanoparticles; nanostructured lipid carriers; spray-drying; essential oil; Lippia sidoides; pepper rosemary

资金

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior) [88887.368385/2019-00]
  2. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) [M-ERA-NET/0004/2015, UIDB/04469/2020]
  3. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2018/26069-0, 2011/10333-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Essential oils (EOs) are widely used in various industrial sectors but can present several instability problems when exposed to environmental factors. Encapsulation technologies are effective solutions to improve EOs properties and stability. Currently, the encapsulation in lipid nanoparticles has received significant attention, due to the several recognized advantages over conventional systems. The study aimed to investigate the influence of the lipid matrix composition and spray-drying process on the physicochemical properties of the lipid-based nanoparticles loaded with Lippia sidoides EO and their retention efficiency for the oil. The obtained spray-dried products were characterized by determination of flow properties (Carr Index: from 25.0% to 47.93%, and Hausner ratio: from 1.25 to 1.38), moisture (from 3.78% to 5.20%), water activity (<0.5), and powder morphology. Zeta potential, mean particle size and polydispersity index, of the redispersed dried product, fell between -25.9 mV and -30.9 mV, 525.3 nm and 1143 nm, and 0.425 and 0.652, respectively; showing slight differences with the results obtained prior to spray-drying (from -16.4 mV to -31.6 mV; 147 nm to 1531 nm; and 0.459 to 0.729). Thymol retention in the dried products was significantly lower than the values determined for the liquid formulations and was affected by the drying of nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据