4.7 Article

Rewiring of Microbiota Networks in Erosive Inflammation of the Stomach and Small Bowel

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00299

关键词

magnetically guided capsule endoscopy; metagenomics; edge-network analysis; chronic gastritis; small bowel erosion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81873143, 61803360]
  2. Double-Hundred Talent Plan of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine [20191831]
  3. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Western Medicine Guide project [17411966500]
  4. Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Transformation Medicine and Innovation Center Research Project [TM201723]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of non-invasive, inexpensive, and effective early diagnosis tests for gastric and small-bowel lesions is an urgent requirement. The introduction of magnetically guided capsule endoscopy (MGCE) has aided examination of the small bowel for diagnoses. However, the distribution of the fecal microbiome in abnormal erosions of the stomach and small bowel remains unclear. Herein, alternations in the fecal microbiome in three groups [normal, small-bowel inflammation, and chronic gastritis (CG)] were analyzed by metagenomics and our well-developed method [individual-specific edge-network analysis (iENA)]. In addition to the dominant microbiota identified by the conventional differential analysis, iENA could recognize novel network biomarkers of microbiome communities, such as the genus Bacteroide in CG and small-bowel inflammation. Combined with differential network analysis, the network-hub microbiota within rewired microbiota networks revealed high-ranked iENA microbiota markers, which were disease specific and had particular pathogenic functions. Our findings illuminate the components of the fecal microbiome and the importance of specific bacteria in CG and small-bowel erosions, and could be employed to develop preventive and non-invasive therapeutic strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据