4.7 Article

3D Printing of Bone Grafts for Cleft Alveolar Osteoplasty - In vivo Evaluation in a Preclinical Model

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00217

关键词

3D printing; bone graft; bone tissue engineering; alveolar cleft model; calcium phosphate cement

资金

  1. internal research grant MeDDriveStart of the Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universitat Dresden (Germany)
  2. European Social Fund (ESF)
  3. Free State of Saxony
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  5. Charite -Universitatsmedizin Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the most common hereditary craniofacial anomalies in humans are cleft lip and cleft alveolar bone with or without cleft palate. Current clinical practice, the augmentation of the persisting alveolar bone defect by using autologous bone grafts, has considerable disadvantages motivating to an intensive search for alternatives. We developed a novel therapy concept based on 3D printing of biodegradable calcium phosphate-based materials and integration of osteogenic cells allowing fabrication of patient-specific, tissue-engineered bone grafts. Objective of the present study was the in vivo evaluation of implants in a rat alveolar cleft model. Scaffolds were designed according to the defect's geometry with two different pore designs (60 degrees and 30 degrees rotated layer orientation) and produced by extrusion-based 3D plotting of a pasty calcium phosphate cement. The scaffolds filled into the artificial bone defect in the palate of adult Lewis rats, showing a good support. Half of the scaffolds were colonized with rat mesenchymal stromal cells (rMSC) prior to implantation. After 6 and 12 weeks, remaining defect width and bone formation were quantified histologically and by microCT. The results revealed excellent osteoconductive properties of the scaffolds, a significant influence of the pore geometry (60 degrees > 30 degrees), but no enhanced defect healing by pre-colonization with rMSC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据