4.7 Article

γδ T-cell reconstitution after HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation depleted of TCR-αβ+/CD19+ lymphocytes

期刊

BLOOD
卷 125, 期 15, 页码 2349-2358

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-599423

关键词

-

资金

  1. AIRC [IG-13018]
  2. Special Grant 5xmille [9962]
  3. My first AIRC grant [15925]
  4. Ministero della Salute [RF-2010-2308270, RF-2010-2316606]
  5. Grant 5xmille
  6. Ricerca Corrente
  7. Ministero dell'Istruzione, Universita e Ricerca (Grant Progetto di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale, PRIN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We prospectively assessed functional and phenotypic characteristics of gamma delta T lymphocytes up to 7 months after HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) depleted of alpha beta(+) T cells and CD19(+) B cells in 27 children with either malignant or nonmalignant disorders. We demonstrate that (1) gamma delta T cells are the predominant T-cell population in patients during the first weeks after transplantation, being mainly, albeit not only, derived from cells infused with the graft and expanding in vivo; (2) central-memory cells predominated very early posttransplantation for both V delta 1 and V delta 2 subsets; (3) V delta 1 cells are specifically expanded in patients experiencing cytomegalovirus reactivation and are more cytotoxic compared with those of children who did not experience reactivation; (4) these subsets display a cytotoxic phenotype and degranulate when challenged with primary acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemia blasts; and (5) V delta 2 cells are expanded in vitro after exposure to zoledronic acid (ZOL) and efficiently lyse primary lymphoid and myeloid blasts. This is the first detailed characterization of gamma delta T cells emerging in peripheral blood of children after CD19(+) B-cell and alpha beta(+) T-cell-depleted haplo-HSCT. Our results can be instrumental to the development of clinical trials using ZOL for improving gamma delta T-cell killing capacity against leukemia cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据