4.6 Article

Differential expression of the T-cell inhibitor TIGIT in glioblastoma and MS

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000712

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [RG 4866-A-2]
  2. Gregory M. Kiez and Mehmet Kutman Foundation
  3. NIH [P01 AI045757, U19 AI089992, P01 AI073748, U24AI11867, R0AI22220, UM1HG009390, P01 AI039671, P50CA121974]
  4. Nancy Taylor Foundation for Chronic Diseases
  5. NMSS [RG-1802-30153CA, 1061-A-18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To identify coinhibitory immune pathways important in the brain, we hypothesized that comparison of T cells in lesions from patients with MS with tumor-infiltrating T cells (TILs) from patients with glioblastoma multiforme may reveal novel targets for immunotherapy. Methods We collected fresh surgical resections and matched blood from patients with glioblastoma, blood and unmatched postmortem CNS tissue from patients with MS, and blood from healthy donors. The expression of TIGIT, CD226, and their shared ligand CD155 as well as PD-1 and PDL1 was assessed by both immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Results We found that TIGIT was highly expressed on glioblastoma-infiltrating T cells, but was near-absent from MS lesions. Conversely, lymphocytic expression of PD-1/PD-L1 was comparable between the 2 diseases. Moreover, TIGIT was significantly upregulated in circulating lymphocytes of patients with glioblastoma compared with healthy controls, suggesting recirculation of TILs. Expression of CD226 was also increased in glioblastoma, but this costimulatory receptor was expressed alongside TIGIT in the majority of tumor-infiltrating T cells, suggesting functional counteraction. Conclusions The opposite patterns of TIGIT expression in the CNS between MS and glioblastoma reflects the divergent features of the immune response in these 2 CNS diseases. These data raise the possibility that anti-TIGIT therapy may be beneficial for patients with glioblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据